Pages
▼
Monday, 30 March 2020
CiM Testing: Candlelight
As soon as I saw this glass I knew I would love it and I was right. I think that’s why I put off using it until towards the end of testing; I was saving the best for last and yep, Candlelight is probably my favourite out of all of the new CiM glasses. It's perfectly named too.
Candlelight is a transparent very pale yellow. It melts *perfectly* and it is just the right consistency to work with. Sometimes pale transparents can be quite stiff but this is just right. The glass has a wonderful clarity to it – no bubbles. If I get my hands on more of this I swear that it will never see the tumbler because this glass needs to shine; the way the light plays with it is magical.
Oh, and this is probably irrelevant but I’m saying it anyway: the way it looks when it is molten is absolutely marvellous! While hot it is the most amazing golden yellow and it’s mesmerising to see.
LOVE LOVE LOVE.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
Saturday, 28 March 2020
CiM Testing: Luzern
And what a glass it is! I love it. It's a gorgeous, rich orchid pinky-purple and judging by its original number it's a variant of CiM Heather.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: 2020.11.17 60203
In rod form, this unnamed glass* is a very nice tanzanite blue colour but upon heating and after annealing it turns into a very intense cobalt blue. The glass is a cloudy transparent.
The glass worked fine and I had no trouble with it.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
* There's only a very small amount of these glasses that have a number instead of a name. Because there's only a tiny amount of each one Kathy at CiM didn't feel it was worth naming them.
CiM Testing: Rosaline Pink
Rosaline Pink is another cloudy transparent and it's quite similar to Morgan, although it lacks Morgan's slight subtle shimmer. Rosaline Pink does have a slight yellowness to it, though.
This one was a tad shocky but only mildly so; the rod did that fracturing thing as opposed to the full pop-and-send-hot-bits-flying thing. Apart from that, it was fine to melt.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Adriatic
Adriatic is the misty opal partner of Daydream.
Although I didn't encounter any shockiness with Adriatic, I did have a little bit of typical blue fussiness in the form of scumming, but nothing so bad that I couldn't pluck it out.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Fruit Punch
Another cloudy transparent, this time in an unusual, slightly brownish, orange-red brick kind of colour called Fruit Punch.
The glass was quite stiff to work with but apart from that, which is just an observation and nothing negative, it was great to use.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Pink Lemonade
Its pinkness and its cloudiness puts me in mind of candyfloss.
Another trouble-free glass with no usage issues.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Pink Dogwood
Pink Dogwood is one of the new Creation is Messy cloudy transparents. It's a pale pink glass that has a lovely haziness to it. The glass was unfussy to use with no shocking.
Really pretty. I like this one very much.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Surf's Up
Surf's Up is the misty opal version of Peacock Feather and its a really lovely bright blue with a touch of green about it.
The glass was really well-behaved with no shocking. I also had no 'blue fussiness' trouble with cooling and reheating and was able to do so without any troublesome scumming occurring.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Sea Glass with Dichro
The glass was pretty shocky and I had to warm it very slowly and even then it popped and cracked. When I eventually got it molten enough to work with it was fine. I tried to make a second bead with the glass that was left and I got off to a good start but then I encountered a line of trapped air within the rod and it produced such huge bubbles that it was impossible to work with it any further.
In my opinion, aesthetically, this the most successful of the CiM dichroic glasses and the resulting bead glimmers prettily when it catches the light.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
Wednesday, 25 March 2020
CiM Testing: Lovebirds & Witches' Brew
I’m lumping these two together into one post because they are very similar. Both are the same yellow-green with Lovebirds (left half of the first pic) being the translucent opal and Witches’ Brew (right half of the first pic) being the misty opal.
In both cases the glass is great – no fussiness, no shocking, and a good middle-of-the-road consistency. The photograph above is Lovebirds The two photos below are Witches' Brew.
CiM Testing: Shamrock
Shamrock is the translucent opal version of Avonlea. It’s a rich, bright green that works nicely with no fussiness. The rod I’ve got is a bit bubbly but no overly so.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Daydream
Daydream is the translucent opal other half of Adriatic, with Adriatic being the misty opal.
Daydream is a rich, bright blue. It is a very well-behaved blue and it doesn’t scum or pit. No shocking either.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
Saturday, 21 March 2020
CiM Testing: Nursery Pink
This is a weird one. At first glance, in rod form, Nursery Pink looks almost clear. It’s got just the very slightest whiff of pink about it. I could see some sort of lines within the glass so I got my trusty macro lens and took a shot of the end of the rod (see photo below) and look! Definite pinkness.
The glass is quite bubbly but it’s not at all shocky or fussy in any other way. I absolutely love a pale transparent but this is *very* pale to the point where I look at the finished beads and ask “Are they actually pink?”
Maybe I’ve missed something? Perhaps someone else can get Nursery Pink to do some form of glass magic? Of course, it could be that I’m overthinking it (probably) and it simply is just a really really pale transparent pink.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Goddess
Goddess is a bright blue misty opal. The glass is fine to work with and the only issue I had with it was some slight fizzy scumming. At first I thought it was devitrification but when I inspected the first bead I made with it, after annealing, I realised it was probably just a case of what I’m calling ‘Blue Fussiness’. Some blue glasses like to be kept hot (think Effetre transparent Dark Aqua 036, or CiM Leaky Pen) and they don’t appreciate the temperature fluctuations that go alongside sculpting. My constant faffing about upset the glass and it fizzed, creating patches of white scummy-looking bits.
I had a second attempt and made a conscious decision to constantly keep the bead as warm as I could and I had a much better result, so yeah, classic Blue Fussiness. You can just see a little bit of the white microbubbling in the second photo, on the right hand side of the bead in the midsection.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: London Fog
I encountered no shockiness, bubbling or pitting, but I found it is quite soft so don’t get working it too hot. The heart bead kept losing its shape as I was working on it but the glass stood up to repeated heating, cooling and shaping really well. Very pretty glass!
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Unicorn
Unicorn is a translucent opal white that plays nicely and works really well with stringer. The silver core bead here is decorated with scrolls in Effetre Periwinkle 220
Unicorn is a really good base glass and it would work well for sculpting too – not too soft, nor too stiff.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.
Wednesday, 18 March 2020
CiM Testing: Morgan
When I first saw this rod of glass I was intrigued by it. It looks like one of the other new cloudy transparents, with the coloured glass inside the clear (have a look at the the Vintage Rose glass I posted yesterday) but the rod has a very pale golden shimmer to it.
As soon as I started melting it I could see some sort of pearlescent effect happening. I’m not totally sure because I haven’t spoken to Kathy at CiM about it, so I’m just hunchy-guessing here, but I think it might be an attempt at that ‘shampoo’ glass.
EDIT: Morgan is NOT intended to be a slightly shimmery shampoo style glass; it was just a happy accident that occurred while trying to make another colour. Glass: it never stops weirding us out!
Morgan is clear teamed with a very pretty pale pink and I think the yellowy pearly tinge you can see is perhaps pale gold mica powder? Maybe? (Like I say, I’m totally Sherlocking here.)
Whatever Morgan is, I like it. The pearly effect is subtle but it’s definitely there and when you move the bead the light catches it in a beautiful glimmery way.
No shockiness, but there are a few tiny bubbles – nothing too obtrusive, though.
The bead was photographed indoors in natural daylight.
CiM Testing: Chocolate
Although you can’t really see any cloudiness here, Chocolate is one of CiM’s new cloudy transparents. It’s a true dark chocolate brown. The cloudy transparency allows a certain amount of light to shine through the bead but at the same time the glass appears mostly opaque. If you were to use a thin layer of it over something else it would act like a dark transparent and you’d get a less saturated brown.
What’s lovely about this glass is that when used on its own, like I’ve used it here, it’s a true dark brown and it has no streakiness like actual opaque dark brown glass often gets.
Another trouble-free glass. No working weirdness to report.
The scrolls on these are CiM Toto.
The beads were photographed indoors in natural daylight.